Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/21/2014 12:38 (04/21/2014 12:38) |
| Message-ID | <slrnll9td8.sun.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
In article <3cs9l9l4l82lrfmt9cur0qen8p9turn172@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
No, I haven't. Or rather - link me to the message where I was shown in what manner "1/24" is statistics and how it relates to the context it was offered in.Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
Tony found one anomaly when checking 24 items one time, and treated it as statistics - you just agreed with me that it doesn't mean anything since it says nothing about the state of anomalies in a statistical manner.
It is still a statistic even if it doesn't usefully address the point you want to cover.
No. Or rather - why not try to falsify my statement, Eric? Why just bloviate about things you don't understand. We have a number: "1/24" - tell me what statistics this is and how it relates to the context to which it was added.
You have already been told.
You didn't understand the first time and I don't expect you to do any better if I or Tony tell you again.You have to do it once to do it again.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
