Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/28/2014 23:00 (04/29/2014 09:00) |
Message-ID | <p7gtl9dii0l62chbpmgmfn0alp7ijql748@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (6m) > Eric Stevens android (7h & 27m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanYou are either very dense or being deliberately difficult.
In article <j45sl99d2e8dpisaoqe48vqgtclgraek94@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanandroid
In article <8t8ql9l6nvo03uvvdk3phfdepvkdl191et@4ax.com>,Tony Cooperandroid
Right. Absolutely right. A thread is *always* determined by the subject line. You created a new thread.
Silly me. I thought a thread was a series of articles with references in their headers to others. And that the original article would have no such references...How's the weather? ;-)Eric Stevens
The references are but a tool to enable management.
Management of what?
Of the sequencing of the articles.
Make up your mind. The post in question:
<slrnll8p8n.sun.mr@irc.sandman.net>
Had content in it's References header, something you now agree is to be used to manage the sequence of the article in relation to other articles (i.e. the thread) yet you seem to ALSO claim that it is a completely new thread, meaning that it should NOT be sequenced with other posts.
Please clarify.