Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 04/15/2014 23:04 (04/16/2014 09:04) |
| Message-ID | <kg7rk9t0pf9cf0e3fm8fp0vgj5sn7vjnn4@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (17h) > Eric Stevens |
On 15 Apr 2014 12:31:35 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanYep. That's what he said, right at the beginning. It was entirely clear what his calculations were based on.
In article <655qk9pcrvmt7ct2vp6f0dbnk38rbcj5c7@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CoopernospamTony CooperTony Coopernospam
I think, based on a comment by you some time ago, I did check a Best Buy and found one of 24 that wouldn't turn on and reported that information here. I wouldn't call that "often".
you think wrong.
Well, you consider 4-point-something percent of the display models to be without a battery to be enough to be "often", so that shows your aptitude in assessing a problem. It does cast doubt on your use of "numerous", though.
where did you come up with 4.something% ? oh yea, your ass.
24 cameras on display, 1 non-working (presumably w/o battery) 4.something percent non-working. An even 4% would be less than one unit.
Ironic that you should talk about problem-assesing when your number is based on one visit to one store.
Well, nospam's inability to recognise what was being calculated was a little disconcerting. If I had made the same error at the age of 10 I expect my teacher would have made an equivalent comment. --Tony CooperSandman
It's right up above. You need to download an app to do the math?
And classic troll insults.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
04/14/2014-
