Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 04/18/2014 13:47 (04/18/2014 07:47) |
| Message-ID | <2v32l995h6p4cm9k5tvtvcmj73c7vgtfbb@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Savageduck (3h & 15m) > Tony Cooper |
On 18 Apr 2014 11:22:54 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanI don't think you lied. I think you just made a mistake in writing B&H instead of Best Buy, but I have no idea why you think a Best Buy's camera inventory is something to report on or to compare with Colonial Photo's inventory.
In article <2014041720193654426-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck wrote:SandmanSavageduckTony CooperSandman
Something like 5,000 people a day shop at B&H. How would you fit them in a "tiny" store.
I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.
You can't possibly be serious, unless you were in Bob & Harry's photo store. You don't sound as if you actually visited B&H Photo Video.
Huh? Are you saying that the Best Buy at 1620 W Osceola Pkwy has a much larger camera section than I am claiming it does? Why on earth would I lie about that? IN fact, have I ever lied at any point? (Hint: no).
The camera section in this Best Buy was small, they had very few SLR bodies around, and a very small selection of P&S cameras as well.
Your next mistake will be to not just admit you erred in several posts and didn't catch your error despite clear indications in responses that B&H is a NYC store.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
04/14/2014-
