Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
From | Whisky-dave |
Date | 04/16/2014 17:57 (04/16/2014 08:57) |
Message-ID | <afab7373-f8c4-429c-a86a-5decc7660ffb@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1d, 10h & 32m) > Whisky-dave |
SandmanIn what way do you mean smaller on the inside like the Tardis ?
In article <s69rk9dqeaov7ksrm8v5uo7cpkrpn5ln81@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanFrom recommendation from Tony, I went to Colonial Photo and Hobby, just to check it out. Was a really small store with one half hobby and the other photo-related stuff. Pretty cramped, but really nice british salesman that I talked to.Eric Stevens
Here is their web site. It gives some idea of their size. http://www.colonialphotohobby.com/index.htm
Uh, yeah? I was there, remember? It was a tiny store. Why is this a problem for you? Do you have some form of pride invested into the size of this store? Why? What's it to you?
Size is a relative thing, especially if you judge by the size of B&H or similar.
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.
Why to you think this type of link is referred to as tinyurl ?Eric Stevens
And here is what they sell it in: http://tinyurl.com/ku9es8f
Understand it......Physically they are not large but judging by what they do, they are quite a big store. At least they feel that way to me.Sandman
I'm not sure what I should do with this information.