Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 05/04/2014 03:52 (05/03/2014 21:52) |
Message-ID | <cn6bm9hr2envf3chonv12j4us76id3gbv8@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 12m) |
Eric StevensThere's ample evidence that no one with any smarts would think they could ever "win" with Popinjay if winning is when the loser admits defeat. His ego won't allow him to admit being wrong or uninformed.
On Sat, 3 May 2014 16:51:54 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:Savageduck
On 2014-05-03 23:25:39 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>said:Eric StevensSavageduck
On Sat, 03 May 2014 18:09:14 -0400, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:PeterNEric Stevens
On 5/3/2014 5:42 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
<snip>Eric StevensPeterN
You are flanneling, as usual. Anyone who has read Usenet for more than a few days will know that "the use of single emphatic quotation marks is standard, as are *asterisks* and _underlining_," although they may not immediately realise that "underlining is less common in recent years."
I thought you were going to stop feeding the troll. WTF is the importance of who "wins."
I'm not interested in winning. I'm interested in the truth of the matter.
Actually all three of you are interested in "winning" regardless of this so called search for truth.