Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | PeterN |
Date | 04/26/2014 01:35 (04/25/2014 19:35) |
Message-ID | <ljerfh019hs@news4.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (26m) > PeterN |
Tony CooperBack to understanding the nuance of words. From a comment, that I suspect was made by someone whose English is not their first language.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:27:24 +1200, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:Tony CooperSandmanEric Stevens
Also consider that the rest of the world uses the metric system, and "70,000 suare feet" isn't a good size reference for me either way.
I find it very hard to believe that you don't know that dividing by 10 is a good approximation i.e. 7000 sq mtrs.
I made some reference to someone's camera recently, and Popinjay went on a minor rant about me not looking up the camera before commenting. What's easier to look up than a conversion site to understand what 70,000 square feet is in his system of measurement?