Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 04/25/2014 23:07 (04/26/2014 09:07) |
| Message-ID | <sajll9tn8f52d56u2scsc6m988pv1a7j80@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (13h & 51m) > Eric Stevens |
On 25 Apr 2014 14:54:46 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanYou must think none of us can read. Look at the name you gave this thread!
In article <4bskl9996lku3pvham5k5gnff4fenlv70c@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CooperSavageduckSandman
there was no need to keep pounding away at this issue, and the time has come for Tony, Eric and you to close this endless debate.
They won't. I didn't "open" it, I am merely responding to their trolling and misinformation.
Well, score one for Popinjay in the Biggest Lie Made In The Stupidest Way record book.
My god you're dumb.Tony CooperSandman
You *started* this thread.
Of course I did, and the purpose was to report on something photo-related. You then choose to make it your own troll circus, and I'm merely here correcting your misinformation.Tony CooperSandman
The opening salvo came out of your popgun defense of your repeated error. It does take some audacity to claim you didn't "open" it when it's in a thread you opened.
Why can't you READ? Why is it so hard for you?? My first post in this thread was not part of any "debate", moron.
" Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)"
Then go and read the article with which you opened it.
"Here Tony called me a liar, something I take pretty seriously."
How can you be so stupid as to now claim that "the purpose was to report on something photo-related"? --
Regards,
Eric Stevens
04/14/2014-
