Skip to main content
news

Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby

Tony Cooper
SubjectRe: Colonial Photo & Hobby
FromTony Cooper
Date04/19/2014 02:40 (04/18/2014 20:40)
Message-ID<a9h3l9t9islev6vbhbs0ba2cl1tck6umub@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (33m)

On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:41:28 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <rar2l9lnc0fagmp3pvt26rgc0ma1k13eha@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:

Eric Stevens
An estimate with some hard numbers behind it, including error data and an acceptable estimate of probability might be regarded as statistical data. Without that kind of support, it's just a guess.

Sandman
No, it's not just a guess. It had some hard data behind it, it's just that nospam couldn't remember the actual numbers, so based on memory, he estimated them to be something close to what they were.

Tony Cooper
He didn't even count or test some of the cameras.

nospam
i don't need to check every single one. it was a random sample and more than one failed.

it was also not a one time event. it's actually fairly common.

So you spend quite a bit of time in Best Buy camera departments?

there are often non-functional products in big box stores because people abuse the products and nobody gives a shit about fixing them, or they're on display and missing some key component, usually a battery because people steal them and it's not always possible to connect it to a power source.

Oh, you spend quite a bit of time in big box stores in their camera department.

Is this a hobby of yours? Or, do you just like checking out big box stores? You don't have shoe camera, do you?

-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL

nospam (33m)