Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 04/27/2014 17:56 (04/27/2014 11:56) |
| Message-ID | <vu9ql9pd497c6bhvt7c29nu8k9rhgkeo3b@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (1h & 58m) |
On 27 Apr 2014 10:42:07 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanAnd why did he add the requirement? Because he *wanted* that to be a requirement. Back to square one.
In article <p3jol956vjcke7rn76b8chgmgoqkkahhvo@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanNo, it wasn't logically correct. But I do understand that you would come in to defend him. Trust me, he needs all the help he can get. He's total road kill by now.Eric Stevens
Person A who wants something specific done adds it as a requirement.
No, he doesn't. A requirement is something that HAS to be done, not something you WANT to be done.Eric StevensSandman
From then on persons B, C, D etc have to that specific thing.
Use it in an example.
Person A wants a pizza, so he adds the "requirement" that for person B to visit him, he has to bring along a pizza, or else he's not welcome.
The desire is a pizza The requirement for person B to visit is to bring a pizza
You're breakfast for the crows on a motorväg, and have been for some time in this debate.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
04/14/2014-
