Skip to main content
news

Re: Will Tony apologize? (w...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)
FromEric Stevens
Date04/29/2014 11:37 (04/29/2014 21:37)
Message-ID<ejsul995fdqlfedkgiklohabttvlha965d@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (3h & 18m) > Eric Stevens

On 29 Apr 2014 05:19:11 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <kmltl9lkp7l6sa1sa1unlrhq9evekse378@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
From then on persons B, C, D etc have to that specific thing.

Sandman
Yes, and a very good example that shows that Tony used the word incorrectly, which was my point. A requirement is not what you want to do, which your example clearly shows.

Eric Stevens
It is if I am person A.

Sandman
In your example, there were no requirements posed for person A, he's the one who added it, not the one subject to it.

Eric Stevens
Person A will have to use a password to log in, just like everyone else.

Sandman
Not in your example, but even so, it's still the same.

Desire - Person A want added security Requirement - Enable measure of identification

Desire - Person A want to use the computer Requirement - Submit password

"A requirement is what you want to do" - Andreas Skitsnack

If that were true - the above would read:

Desire - Person A want to submit a password

No it wouldn't. It would read 'Person A needs to submit a password'. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Sandman (3h & 18m) > Eric Stevens