Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/29/2014 11:37 (04/29/2014 21:37) |
Message-ID | <ejsul995fdqlfedkgiklohabttvlha965d@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (3h & 18m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanNo it wouldn't. It would read 'Person A needs to submit a password'. --
In article <kmltl9lkp7l6sa1sa1unlrhq9evekse378@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandmanEric Stevens
From then on persons B, C, D etc have to that specific thing.
Yes, and a very good example that shows that Tony used the word incorrectly, which was my point. A requirement is not what you want to do, which your example clearly shows.
It is if I am person A.
In your example, there were no requirements posed for person A, he's the one who added it, not the one subject to it.
Person A will have to use a password to log in, just like everyone else.
Not in your example, but even so, it's still the same.
Desire - Person A want added security Requirement - Enable measure of identification
Desire - Person A want to use the computer Requirement - Submit password
"A requirement is what you want to do" - Andreas Skitsnack
If that were true - the above would read:
Desire - Person A want to submit a password