Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 04/28/2014 01:34 (04/28/2014 11:34) |
| Message-ID | <it4rl9d6bkav6serqnb429bntn46vrgkha@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | android |
| Followups | Sandman (6h & 6m) > Eric Stevens android (10h & 35m) |
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:37:11 +0200, android <here@there.was>wrote:
androidThe references are but a tool to enable management. What is and what is not a thread is in the mind of the reader. In my mind, a new subject is a new thread, irrespective of it's ancestry.
In article <8t8ql9l6nvo03uvvdk3phfdepvkdl191et@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:Tony Cooperandroid
Right. Absolutely right. A thread is *always* determined by the subject line. You created a new thread.
Silly me. I thought a thread was a series of articles with references in their headers to others. And that the original article would have no such references...
How's the weather? ;-)
It's cool, sunny and blowing from the SW. --
Regards,
Eric Stevens
04/14/2014-
