Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/28/2014 10:53 (04/28/2014 10:53) |
Message-ID | <slrnlls5u2.772.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (12h & 11m) > Sandman |
Yes, and a very good example that shows that Tony used the word incorrectly, which was my point. A requirement is not what you want to do, which your example clearly shows.SandmanEric StevensEric StevensSandman
From then on persons B, C, D etc have to that specific thing.
Use it in an example.
I want security on my computer.
I.e. you *desire* security, security isn't required of you. It's something you want. Fine, good use of the word "want" there!Eric StevensSandman
I have set it up so it is requirement that all users have to log in with a password.
I.e. "all users" are required to submit a password, and it's not something they "want".Now, remember the quote from Andreas:"A requirement is what you want to do"Eric Stevens
You go away and argue with Tony about his definition. You asked me to give an example ilustrating the situation I put forward in Message-ID: <p3jol956vjcke7rn76b8chgmgoqkkahhvo@4ax.com>and that is what I have done.
Of course, since it's fact and logic.SandmanEric Stevens
And see how it differs from your examples. You're describing the scenario of "My desires may lead to added requirements", which is fine, but Andreas had it on backwards. He's saying "A = B" while you're saying "B ~>A"
That's your interpretation. I think it is the beginning of a cloud of squink.
I.e. plain English.From when I did that persons B, C, D etc have to log into my computer with a password if they want to use it.Sandman
See how what they WANT to do is "use the computer", not "enter a password".Desire - Something you want to do. Requirement - Something you have to do.Eric Stevens
Thick or deliberately confusing.