Skip to main content
news

Re: Will Tony apologize?? (...

Tony Cooper
SubjectRe: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)
FromTony Cooper
Date05/03/2014 22:20 (05/03/2014 16:20)
Message-ID<ukjam9ldaq7dhg3urin4ofvmkescns4ig8@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (14h & 30m)

On 3 May 2014 20:02:42 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <4q4am9hfno7dlolo6g4f60nt7vo0063mjq@4ax.com>, Andreas Skitsnack wrote:

That's called "inference". Where the reader infers meaning from the writer's words that aren't explicitly written.

What sometimes is called "unintended implication" is when a statement by someone has an obvious inference that the writer didn't think of. When a car ad says "New and improved", it's sometimes called an "unintended implication" that the old model was old and lousy.

Tony Cooper
And you are arguing elsewhere that there is no such thing as an unintended inference.

Sandman
Unintended inference? What are you talking about? You're even more confused than usual.

You're the one with the newsreader that shows all posts. Notice the one that followed this where I said it was an error and corrected it. It's not like I wrote several posts in a row where I thought I was in a B&H and not in a Best Buy despite warnings. It doesn't take me half a dozen posts to notice I made an error.

But, as you can probably realize, that *wasn't* the implication in any shape or form, since an implication is when the writer indicates the existence of something by suggestion rather than explicit reference, which the one making the car ad certainly didn't do.

Tony Cooper
Whoa! The writer most certainly created the suggestion. If it's "improved", it *must* be better than it was. The suggestion is there, but the parameters are not.

Sandman
We know you're illiterate, Andreas. Why this urge to prove it over and over again?

<snip trolling>

Yeah...snip what you can't refute. You walked into it, and weaseled out.

-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL

Sandman (14h & 30m)