Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 05/03/2014 16:33 (05/03/2014 16:33) |
Message-ID | <slrnlm9vn1.f0u.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (1h & 29m) |
Tony CooperHope you learned something.
It's interesting to watch you work.
See below, what you ignored:Tony CooperWhy have you used "emphasis quotes" around "correct" when you have just provided a list of instances where quotation marks are to be used?Sandman
I didn't. I didn't emphasize the word correct, I used it accordingly to point number 4: unusual usage.
Hmmm. "Correct" is an unusual word in the concept of finding the right word?
Don't you mean I "do" very often struggle?SandmanTony Cooper
I.e. I used the word "correct" (point 5, word reference) and put quotation marks around it to signify that the word "correct" shouldn't be used, since the basis of the comment was to let you know that there may be no correct word.
Again, that may be the case with you. You *do* very often struggle to find the correct word. Not so difficult with most people, though.
I can't remember ever doing that. And don't you mean I "do"?Sandman
No, only if I wanted to emphasize the word. There is a world of difference between these to statements:1. You have to use the "correct" word. 2. You have to use the *correct* word.The first example is in reference to you having to use a word, that may not technically be correct, but for the scenario at hand, it may be the one that is most applicable.Tony Cooper
So you *do* listen to me.
That is the problem that I have to point out so often in your writing. You find a word that you *think* is the technically correct word but is not the word that is the most applicable or appropriate for the context.Ironic, coming from the guy that made these statements:
Incorrect.Sandman
The second example signifies that there is a correct word, and you have to use it. Some examples of usage:Emphasis: Andreas: Open sessimie! Sandman: No, you have to use the *correct* word!- I am telling you that there is a correct word and you must use it.Tony Cooper
The correct word *is* used.
No one claimed it was. Why can't you read??SandmanTony Cooper
Unusual usage: Andreas: The thingamajig won't work! Sandman: I can't help you unless you use the "correct" word
"Thingamajig" is not an unusual word, especially in that context.
I am 100% correct, and nothing you ever write is even close to counter anything I write. You just try to flood the group with nonsense to make it appear youve responded when you've not understood a single thing.SandmanTony Cooper
- I am telling you that the word you used wasn't satisfactory, and there may not be one that is correct, but certainly one that works better than "thingamajig".
You are closer here.
Look it up. It's a common enough word.Tony CooperYes, emphasis. He is emphasizing that "idiom" is the *correct* word for this usage.Sandman
Indeed he did, but not by emphasising it. Just referencing it.
Referencing it? What does that mean?
Only if you're illiterate.SandmanTony Cooper
Andreas: Open sessimie! Sandman: It's *sesame*
You could actually go several ways on that one. Asterisks to emphasize, scare quote marks to emphasize
It's not something I "think", I am telling you how it works.Sandman
Andreas: The thingamajig won't work Sandman: I think you mean that "door" doesn't work?Emphasis, word reference.Tony Cooper
Perhaps you think that makes sense.
By us who aren't illiterate.Tony CooperYou've attempted to provide a smoke screen for your ignorance, but - once again - failed miserably. "Word-reference" has no established meaning for Usenet posting style. "Emphasis quote" and "scare quote" do have an established meaning in this venue.Sandman
And those that use it are usually called illiterate. That's the point, Andreas.
Usually? By whom?