Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 05/02/2014 02:57 (05/02/2014 12:57) |
| Message-ID | <noq5m9pab92dce7panai0hnjlerif55umk@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (6h & 2m) |
On 30 Apr 2014 11:23:32 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanOK, I misread it.
In article <pai1m9h14ab8rh86l4b8r0vakif1beu1jl@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:SandmanEric Stevens<> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
>
You didn't look through this lot very thoroughly.
Of course I did.Eric StevensSandman
If you do you will find each news reader has a different idea of when you changed the subject line.
Nope.Eric StevensSandman
Thunderbird After Sandman's article of 2014-4-20
Not "after". I correctly displays that when I posted a followup to the thread at 2014-04-21 02:21, I changed the subject of the post, while displaying it at its correct place in the thread.
I misread that too.Eric StevensSandman
Unison After Sandman's article of 2014-4-20
Same here. 2014-04-21.
It doesn't even seem to suggest there is a subthread.Eric StevensSandman
slrn After Tony Cooper's article of ??
Same here, only slrn doesn't display dates. And the post highlighted is the same exact post of mine as in the other screenshots.
Tin is showing it's age.Eric StevensSandman
tin After Tony Cooper's article of ??
Same here.
Yet another misreading.Eric StevensSandman
pan After Tony Cooper's article of Apr 18 (2014)
Incorrect. Pan correctly shows that I changed the subject at "Apr 21 2:21 AM", not Apr 18.
That seems to do exactly as Agent does except that it hasn't started a new thread with a change of subject.Eric StevensSandman
Knews After Tony Cooper's article of ??
You know what, knews' display is a bit messy, but its thread view isn't very clear. I've uploaded a new screenshot that clearly displays how the post from me at 2014-04-21 is displayed correctly inline in the thread:
<Nope, there is no misunderstanding. I made a simple mistake which, once made, I applied to every one where appropriate.Eric StevensSandman
mtnewswatcher After Tony Cooper's article of 4/18/14
The highlighted thread is mine, and the date is 4/21/2014.Eric StevensSandman
Google Groups After Sandman's article of ??
My article on Apr 21, it is displayed nicely to the right.
You seem to be confused by the *ordering* of articles. This is a *threaded* view, with indentation. If a post is under and indented one step, it is in reply to that post. You are in reference to the preceeding article in the list, which is NOT a chronological view at all.
Question: Do any of these news readers have the ability to show a change of subject as a change of thread?
So you are arguing that any change or improvement is wrong? --Eric StevensSandman
Even allowing for the clipping of your screenshots there doesn't appear to much concensus in this lot.
There is 100% consensus.Eric StevensSandman
Is this the kind of agreement upon which you decide what is standard?
It is indeed.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
04/14/2014-
