Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/26/2014 19:22 (04/26/2014 19:22) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllnqvd.v9e.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (6h & 45m) > Sandman |
In article <0ctml9h713s4jbvoqla5nh3dh5bm69ffjq@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Only, mine does. See RFC 5537, section 3.4.4 for reference of how the References: header must be used.Eric StevensSandman
Unfortunately not all news readers will recognise the change in subject and the response of others may be configurable. But irrespective of how your news reader responds, you started a new thread.
Incorrect. A new thread has an empty References: header. Mine did not.Here is the entire thread again:http://usenet.sandman.net/reader/index/read?id=153422Eric Stevens
You can write software to do anything you like. That doesn't mean that it conforms with a standard.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
