Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/25/2014 06:01 (04/25/2014 16:01) |
Message-ID | <9qkjl95nn53r3sm81u1te6uvmavjf0kv3a@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1h & 46m) > Eric Stevens |
Here is a long list of articles through which you persisted with the error. The articles suggest that yor failure to recognise your error arose from your usual determination to not recognise the possibility of error on your part.Eric StevensSandman
This is not at all like your mistake about B&H where you ploughed ahead resisting all attempts to suggest you were off the rails somewhere.
Oh come one now, Eric. We've been through this already. There were no such attempts. There was a lot of *confusion* because you thought I actually meant B&H which is a NY-store, so you asked me if I had been to NY (in direct response to me saying it was in Florida).
At no time did you ever respond to me with any information that would lead me to see that I made a mistake.SandmanIn my case, it took a while for anyone to prompt me because you got all confused by my mistyping, which is understandable.Eric Stevens
But you persisted with your error, which is the important point.
I did not. The *exact* moment it was brought to my attention that I had made an error did I correct it.
I *made* the error many times, but I didn't "persist" with for a single second. There's a huge difference.
-- Sandman[.net]
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny."bugger"???
It might help you give a reference point when people use words like, large, small, tiny, microscopic etc.I'm quite interested in what Jonas considers to be a "big" store. B&H is a 70,000 square foot store. Something like 5,000 people a day shop at B&H. How would you fit them in a "tiny" store.
Bigger.SandmanEric StevensEric StevensSandman
Sandman: Uh, yeah? I was there, remember? It was a tiny store. Why is this a problem for you? Do you have some form of pride invested into the size of this store? Why? What's it to you?
Eric Stevens: Size is a relative thing, especially if you judge by the size of B&H or similar.
Sandman: Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.
"bugger"???
"...B&H was also very tiny."???
None of that response makes any sense at all.Why not?
I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.You can't possibly be serious, unless you were in Bob & Harry's photo store. You don't sound as if you actually visited B&H Photo Video.
OK! A typo.SandmanColonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.Eric Stevens
"bugger"???
Bigger.
"...B&H was also very tiny."?? Those are your words aren't they? If you consider B&H "very tiny" what exactly do you consider a large store?Eric Stevens
"...B&H was also very tiny."???None of that response makes any sense at all.Sandman
Why not?
I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.You can't possibly be serious, unless you were in Bob & Harry's photo store. You don't sound as if you actually visited B&H Photo Video.
have you ever ben to b&h in new york? it's huge.Eric StevensSandman
Something like 5,000 people a day shop at B&H. How would you fit them in a "tiny" store.
I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.
"...B&H was also very tiny."?? Those are your words aren't they? If you consider B&H "very tiny" what exactly do you consider a large store?B&H's camera section was tiny. I wasn't talking about the entire store, just as I didn't include the size of the entire Colonial store either, since it's some 70% hobby things like model airplanes and such.
B&H is a massive store, the furthest from *very tiny* that anybody could possibly imagine. Take a look at their store information video at full screen.I am fully aware of the size of B&H. I was at on in the Florida Loop. It wasn't "massive", but sure, it's a big store. MediaMarkt in Europe is bigger though, at least that the one in the Loop. BUt, I was only in reference to their tiny camera section, which had some 5-6 SLR bodies, some 10+ P&S and some other assorted cameras.
I'm quite interested in what Jonas considers to be a "big" store. B&H is a 70,000 square foot store.The camera section isn't. You know, the section we're talking about. I didn't include the model train section in the size of the Colonial either, since it is of no interest to a camera store size discussion.
Something like 5,000 people a day shop at B&H. How would you fit them in a "tiny" store.I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.
We have already established that Jonas has mixed up and misidentified a Florida Best Buy as B&H Photo Video of NYC. B&H has no presence in any State other than NY. Its global online reach negates that necessity.SandmanB&H is a massive store, the furthest from *very tiny* that anybody could possibly imagine. Take a look at their store information video at full screen.Eric Stevens
I am fully aware of the size of B&H. I was at on in the Florida Loop. It wasn't "massive", but sure, it's a big store.
Are you talking about the B&H in New York?
Huh? Are you saying that the Best Buy at 1620 W Osceola Pkwy has a much larger camera section than I am claiming it does? Why on earth would I lie about that? IN fact, have I ever lied at any point? (Hint: no).Eric StevensSandman
Sandman: I'm sure the camera section of B&H actually is significantly larger than colonial, when comparing area, but smaller when it comes to actual photorelated merchandise.
You can't possibly be serious, unless you were in Bob & Harry's photo store. You don't sound as if you actually visited B&H Photo Video.
Huh? Are you saying that the Best Buy at 1620 W Osceola Pkwy has a much larger camera section than I am claiming it does? Why on earth would I lie about that? IN fact, have I ever lied at any point? (Hint: no).You understand that up until this morning you have been talking about B&H, not Best Buy? Read your original statement and all your subsequent remarks until this AM.
The camera section in this Best Buy was small, they had very few SLR bodies around, and a very small selection of P&S cameras as well.Savageduck
But, can you buy beach towels, diapers, sun screen, extension cords, and garden implements in your camera store?MediaMarkt isn't a camera store. Neither is B&H, so I'm not sure what camera store you're comparing with here.
Why would anyone ever guess anything related to this. All I said is that I thought BH had a tiny camera section. I have no idea why this is a problem for you. I'm sure there are B&H's that have larger camera sections as well.There is only one B&H, and it is in New York City.
In what way does this affect you in ANY capacity?Nor did you see a B&H in Kissimmee.Eric StevensSandman
But, can you buy beach towels, diapers, sun screen, extension cords, and garden implements in your camera store?
MediaMarkt isn't a camera store. Neither is B&H, so I'm not sure what camera store you're comparing with here.
I didn't see any of the above at the B&H at the loop either,
Why would anyone ever guess anything related to this. All I said is that I thought BH had a tiny camera section. I have no idea why this is a problem for you. I'm sure there are B&H's that have larger camera sections as well. In what way does this affect you in ANY capacity?There is only the one B&H and that is in New York. You have already told us you have never been there. --
We have already established that Jonas has mixed up and misidentified a Florida Best Buy as B&H Photo Video of NYC. B&H has no presence in any State other than NY. Its global online reach negates that necessity.
Now we just have to see if Jonas acknowledges his error.Wow, my bad. You know, I didn't even stop to think about it. I have been talking about Best Buy, yes. Sorry about the confusion.
You wrote about visiting a B&H in "the loop", not a Best Buy.Yes, I mistyped and didn't realize my error.
Here Tony called me a liar, something I take pretty seriously. Well, not the claim itself, when it comes from trolls like Tony, but lying and honesty, which I think is important. Anyone that have read my posts know that whem I make a claim I am *always* happy to support the claim or admit to it being in error. This is the case in 100% of all my claims, ever.Eric StevensSandman
Sandman: B&H's camera section was tiny. I wasn't talking about the entire store, just as I didn't include the size of the entire Colonial store either, since it's some 70% hobby things like model airplanes and such.
A blatant lie.
It took several prods from others for you to wake up and acknowledge your error.No, just one, this one:
That was the post that made me see my error. This is my response:You missed Message-ID: <2014041719593639934-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
Sandman Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby 04/19/2014 <slrnll5o04.i52.mr@irc.sandman.net>
"Wow, my bad. You know, I didn't even stop to think about it. I have been talking about Best Buy, yes. Sorry about the confusion."
Loop. It wasn't "massive", but sure, it's a big store.Are you talking about the B&H in New York?"
You wrote about visiting a B&H in "the loop", not a Best Buy.Yes, I mistyped and didn't realize my error.