Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 04/25/2014 22:03 (04/25/2014 16:03) |
| Message-ID | <snfll9hsjdmdqecqg6regi7c3e0ps4834u@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | PeterN (10m) |
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:38:23 -0400, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:
PeterNYour wife, if she noticed, could have added a requirement far stronger than implication. Not "add a password", but "Tuck your eyes back in, big boy, or you'll be sleeping on the couch." -- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
On 4/25/2014 11:53 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:Tony CooperPeterN
On 25 Apr 2014 14:44:35 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanTony Cooper
Requirement - something you HAVE to do
After someone who wanted to do what the requirement requires adds it as a requirement. It does not exist until added, and it is added because someone wants it to be added.
Sorry to disagree. A requirement need not be something added. It can exist by implication.
A few hours ago I saw this tall, buxom blond woman who was in her late twenties, or early thirties, of the type that I would like to play windshield wiper with. Nobody has to add any requirements for that to happen. They exist by implication.
04/14/2014-
