Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/29/2014 10:23 (04/29/2014 10:23) |
| Message-ID | <slrnlluoh1.be5.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | android |
In article <bs8supFa2u6U1@mid.individual.net>, android wrote:
This isn't a serious question, is it? That's *all* Eric does in this group. Lurking until he finds something he can argue for weeks about. Usually Tony paves the way and then when Tony has lost the argument, Eric joins to reopen it again.androidandroidEric Stevens
A new thread would require a new and not modified subject, new content with out references to another article in order to continue an argument and no references in the headers. The last would be hijacking an old thread since some folks might have marked it and there newsclients might highlight it for them thus giving the articles undue exposure....
It seems as though there are as many ideas of what makes a thread as there are people. In the end I guess it depends upon how each person, personally, wants to file the articles they receive. I'm not going to ram any particular definition down anyone's throat.
So why does this interest you? Are you fishing for conflict? In love with the heat of battle are you?
You obviously don't care about the issue!-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
