Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 04/25/2014 08:31 (04/24/2014 23:31) |
Message-ID | <2014042423313288341-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1h & 37m) > Savageduck Eric Stevens (1h & 43m) |
Sandman<< Le Snip >>
In article <3b2jl9l77avnh7djqurqqmro92m2piv1nn@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
And you did it over and over again, in the face of people queryingActually I knew you had it wrong, and posted a hint which you didn't recognize when this little exchange took place on April 16, 2014 when I found myself entering this thread for the first time:Eric StevensSandman
your usage.
No, I did it over and over again, without anyone querying my *usage*. Everyone thought I was in reference to B&H since well, that's what I was typing. No one was questioning my usage and not until I posted the address to a Best Buy Store did Savageduck realize I had had them mixed up the entire time.
On 2014-04-16 13:34:11 +0000, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>said:Now I know I didn't specifically spell it out then, but I thought you might have figured there was something wrong.Eric StevensSandman
In article <s69rk9dqeaov7ksrm8v5uo7cpkrpn5ln81@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:Eric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandman: From recommendation from Tony, I went to Colonial Photo and Hobby, just to check it out. Was a really small store with one half hobby and the other photo-related stuff. Pretty cramped, but really nice british salesman that I talked to.Sandman
Eric Stevens: Here is their web site. It gives some idea of their size. http://www.colonialphotohobby.com/index.htm
Sandman: Uh, yeah? I was there, remember? It was a tiny store. Why is this a problem for you? Do you have some form of pride invested into the size of this store? Why? What's it to you?
Size is a relative thing, especially if you judge by the size of B&H or similar.
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.
"bugger"???
"...B&H was also very tiny."???
None of that response makes any sense at all.