Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 04/29/2014 16:25 (04/29/2014 10:25) |
Message-ID | <ebdvl9dkm8ulq7pdjru69ma2fho5rmbvvn@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (14m) > Tony Cooper |
SandmanI wouldn't snip a line of this. It is probably the weakest, most ill-formed, argument I've ever seen.
In article <4g9vl95dbtdq4gi3tjcep139gl71qda1gb@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CooperSandmanDesire - Person A want to submit a passwordandroid
To fulfill my desire to drive a car i'm required to have a license that allows me to do so...
Exactly! Your desire is not to have a license, it's to drive a car. Getting a license is a requirement, something you HAVE to do, not what you WANT to do.
And why is that requirement in place? Could it be because someone *wanted* that to be a requirement?
No, someone NEEDED to require people to take driver's license in order to minimize traffic accidents.
It's the same thing, Andreas.
DESIRE - Less traffic accident The government WANT less traffic accidents
REQUIREMENT - Driver license
The government didn't sit down one day and say "Hey, I want driver's licenses". Driver licenses are a means to an end. The end in this case is what the government WANTED.
I don't understand why you continue, you've already proven way beyond a shadow of a doubt that you're way out to lunch and way out of your league on this one, why not just quietly ignore all of this and pretend you never said this stupidity:-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
"a requirement is what you want to do" - Andreas Skitsnack