Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/28/2014 07:09 (04/28/2014 07:09) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllrop0.6fl.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (3h & 23m) > Sandman |
In article <3a6rl9l9a7jvb4gvi1iipq6qmuacoqf6o7@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
I.e. you *desire* security, security isn't required of you. It's something you want. Fine, good use of the word "want" there!Eric StevensEric StevensSandman
From then on persons B, C, D etc have to that specific thing.
Use it in an example.
I want security on my computer.
I have set it up so it is requirement that all users have to log in with a password.I.e. "all users" are required to submit a password, and it's not something they "want".
Now, remember the quote from Andreas:
"A requirement is what you want to do"
And see how it differs from your examples. You're describing the scenario of "My desires may lead to added requirements", which is fine, but Andreas had it on backwards. He's saying "A = B" while you're saying "B ~>A"
From when I did that persons B, C, D etc have to log into my computer with a password if they want to use it.See how what they WANT to do is "use the computer", not "enter a password".
Desire - Something you want to do. Requirement - Something you have to do.
He said, while constructing an example that agreed 100% with everything I've said. Ironic.SandmanEric Stevens
Me neither, and I predicted it as well. He can't handle these things so he has to run away.
While you stand there and blather.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
