Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/29/2014 16:36 (04/29/2014 16:36) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllvecg.d70.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (24m) Eric Stevens (10h & 24m) > Sandman |
In article <4ocvl9h23kqcso54li3gnretkifs7c4hiu@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
It's English, I know it's hard for you to understand. Maybe an adult can walk you through it?SandmanTony Cooper
I've never claimed it is a part of any "standard", I am saying it is "the standard". There's a difference. I'm using it a noun that means "an idea or thing used as a measure, norm or model in comparative evaluations".
Oh, so "non-standard" has nothing to do with a "standard"?
You have made the claim that Agent is a non-standard newsreader, but now you are claiming that your use of the word "standard" should not be taken to mean a part of any "standard"? Is that it?I meant the word as the noun standard. Look it up.
If I follow this convoluted logic that you are trying to foist off on us, a "standard" is a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations. Therefore, Agent is a "standard" because we can use it as a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations.No, only if you don't understand the English language, which is why I'm sure you would do it.
So, Agent is both standard and non-standard. Doesn't the one rather neutralize the other?I cannot explain the mess that is going on only inside your small head, Andreas.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
