Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 05/04/2014 01:51 (05/03/2014 16:51) |
Message-ID | <2014050316515477876-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 25m) |
Eric StevensActually all three of you are interested in "winning" regardless of this so called search for truth. …and none of you is going to concede as to what “the truth of the matter†is.
On Sat, 03 May 2014 18:09:14 -0400, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:PeterNEric Stevens
On 5/3/2014 5:42 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
<snip>Eric StevensPeterN
You are flanneling, as usual. Anyone who has read Usenet for more than a few days will know that "the use of single emphatic quotation marks is standard, as are *asterisks* and _underlining_," although they may not immediately realise that "underlining is less common in recent years."
I thought you were going to stop feeding the troll. WTF is the importance of who "wins."
I'm not interested in winning. I'm interested in the truth of the matter.
In any case, a few minutes ago I posted a message announcing that I am kill-filing Jonas. I would like to think that Tony would kill-file him also. After all, it is so easy to do in Agent.Damn! You are sounding like a hired killer with pre-remorse. If you want to kill-file somebody, just take a deep breath and pull the trigger. Deal with the consequences later. All you are doing is threatening him to kill-file him if he doesn’t STFU or you might have to follow through with your announcement.
I may have a few of Jonas's articles to clean up but, after that, that's the end.Nooooo!!! So you are not going to pull the trigger and walk away? You are not even going to end this endless and tedious thread, sub-thread, and camouflaged pseudo-new thread. If you are not going to kill-file Jonas, the least you could do is turn your back on any clean up articles and start with a fresh slate.