Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
From | nospam |
Date | 04/19/2014 01:41 (04/18/2014 19:41) |
Message-ID | <180420141941284668%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (58m) > nospam |
i don't need to check every single one. it was a random sample and more than one failed.Tony CooperEric StevensSandman
An estimate with some hard numbers behind it, including error data and an acceptable estimate of probability might be regarded as statistical data. Without that kind of support, it's just a guess.
No, it's not just a guess. It had some hard data behind it, it's just that nospam couldn't remember the actual numbers, so based on memory, he estimated them to be something close to what they were.
He didn't even count or test some of the cameras.