Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/26/2014 12:58 (04/26/2014 12:58) |
| Message-ID | <slrnlln4g0.tpk.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (13h & 10m) > Sandman |
In article <sajll9tn8f52d56u2scsc6m988pv1a7j80@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
That's what's I said, wasn't it?Eric StevensTony CooperSandman
The opening salvo came out of your popgun defense of your repeated error. It does take some audacity to claim you didn't "open" it when it's in a thread you opened.
Why can't you READ? Why is it so hard for you?? My first post in this thread was not part of any "debate", moron.
You must think none of us can read.
Look at the name you gave this thread!
" Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)"The name I gave this *thread* was "Colonial Photo & Hobby". Here is the OP:
http://usenet.sandman.net/reader/index/read?id=153422
Scroll down and you can see how the subject line you're in reference is a *part* of that thread, then learn how usenet works.
Then go and read the article with which you opened it.
"Here Tony called me a liar, something I take pretty seriously."
How can you be so stupid as to now claim that "the purpose was to report on something photo-related"?Because that's EXACTLY what I did with this thread.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
