Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/18/2014 04:24 (04/18/2014 04:24) |
| Message-ID | <slrnll13b7.c2d.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
In article <1uttk994cb4dd6j4jqvtdd07pufs1igl08@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
I explained above. Tell me what parts have you confused and I'll see if I can walk you through it. No guarantees thouh.SandmanTony Cooper
You mean, other than his explicit claim about: "I'd estimate that in somewhere around half the visits", which means that he has at least visited enough stores for a number of them being "about half", which puts it roughly in at least around ten stores (4/10 is "about half"), so he already has ten times as much statistical data than you (i.e. infintaely more, since you have none).
Whoa, there. Where do you get that he's visited more than one store?
He doesn't say that.Incorrect.
You're reading something into to it that isn't there.Incorrect.
His statement could refer to three visits to one store. nospam rarely uses specifics; he usually used hand-waves like "most", "a lot", and such. Usually with asterisks that are supposed to give his meaningless claim some emphasis.
You're just making shit up.Good rant there, Tony. Ready to have your ass handed to you? Of course you are. Now bend over:
nospam Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby 04/15/2014 <140420142242069183%nospam@nospam.invalid>
"having seen this occur in more than just one best buy as well as compusa when they were around, it's safe to say it is not a rare occurrence."
Incorrect.Tony CooperAll it really points out is that some Best Buy managers do a better job than others in seeing that the display products are functional and in working order.Sandman
No it doesn't.
Baseless claim, as usual. Unsubstantiated, to use your word.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/14/2014-
