Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 12/06/2013 09:16 (12/06/2013 21:16) |
Message-ID | <9u13a9htidnuttg13l66vg4uu7ma5v7f1g@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | PeterN (7h & 8m) > Eric Stevens nospam (9h & 25m) > Eric Stevens |
nospamAnd the photographer had no idea of what kind of things the lab could do for them. --
In article <l7rhm701ngv@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:PeterNnospam
Is it your claim that in the film days, a good photo artist did not have to understand the how and why of film. He did not have to understand masking with film, the effect of various chemicals, and light sources on things such as contrast, and grain?
my claim is that in film days, knowing how and being proficient in darkroom work was not required.
some photographers did do their own darkroom work, but as i said, it wasn't required. many pro photographers worked with a pro lab who took care of the details.