Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 12/01/2013 03:21 (11/30/2013 21:21) |
Message-ID | <9a6l999179ugroomoh51jd8kruftp0up2i@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
Followups | Floyd L. Davidson (1h & 48m) |
The only way you can effectively sort through 1,000 images at one per second and critically evaluate the images with an eye to which will be processed, which will be kept but not processed, and which will be binned immediately is to have multiple images of a low number of shots. All you'd be doing is picking the best of a multiple series.Tony CooperFloyd L. Davidson
For the high-volume photographer, organization for selection is the most time-consuming aspect. If that photographer took 1,000 shots of an event, reviewing those 1,000 shots and determining which are worthy of efforts in post is the part that takes up time. The actual post work on the individual shots is minimal if the photographer has decent skills using the camera.
Bullshit son. I use a highly modified version of a very old program called XV to sort images. Going through 1000 pictures takes about 15 to 20 minutes at most. Just about 1 per second, more or less.