Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | PeterN |
Date | 12/06/2013 05:26 (12/05/2013 23:26) |
Message-ID | <l7rjkb01ok9@news6.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | Savageduck (29m) > PeterN nospam (49m) > PeterN |
nospamNot require for what. Snapshots and i've been there images, you are right. Is it your claim that a film photographer could produce art without a thorough understanding of what he was doing?
In article <l7rhm701ngv@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:PeterNnospam
Is it your claim that in the film days, a good photo artist did not have to understand the how and why of film. He did not have to understand masking with film, the effect of various chemicals, and light sources on things such as contrast, and grain?
my claim is that in film days, knowing how and being proficient in darkroom work was not required.
some photographers did do their own darkroom work, but as i said, it wasn't required. many pro photographers worked with a pro lab who took care of the details.-- PeterN