Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | Savageduck |
| Date | 12/01/2013 01:33 (11/30/2013 16:33) |
| Message-ID | <2013113016335795019-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (34m) > Savageduck |
On 2013-11-30 23:46:16 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>said:
Eric StevensDon't be silly, of course it can. I was just saying that the R2880 was capable of doing the same.
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:50:24 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:SavageduckEric Stevens
On 2013-11-30 21:38:17 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>said:Eric Stevens
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:55:32 -0500, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:SavageduckPeterNEric Stevens
Many a fine art print has been made with the 2880 and 3880. IMO the 4880 is designed for higher output. I may have been told wrong, but i thought the 4880 produced prints that were equal in quality to the other two, but was designed for higher production rates, and larger format.
... and roll feed.
The R2880 can deal with 13'' x 32' & 13'' x 20' rolls supplied by Epson, Red River Paper, or Moab.
But the 3880 can't.
-- Regards,
Savageduck
11/30/2013-
-
