Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 12/06/2013 09:18 (12/06/2013 21:18) |
Message-ID | <i023a99tm2b1ebk593rv6gckgs26p3k7d6@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Savageduck |
Followups | Savageduck (4h & 13m) > Eric Stevens |
SavageduckJust as long as it is clear: you are confining yourself to that class of photography.
On 2013-12-06 04:26:42 +0000, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>said:PeterNSavageduck
On 12/5/2013 10:58 PM, nospam wrote:nospamPeterN
In article <l7rhm701ngv@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:PeterNnospam
Is it your claim that in the film days, a good photo artist did not have to understand the how and why of film. He did not have to understand masking with film, the effect of various chemicals, and light sources on things such as contrast, and grain?
my claim is that in film days, knowing how and being proficient in darkroom work was not required.
Not require for what. Snapshots and i've been there images, you are right. Is it your claim that a film photographer could produce art without a thorough understanding of what he was doing?
I thought we were talking photography, not art. Photo journalists and documentarians do not consider themselves artists, they are photographers. ...and then there are the snapshot shooters who can on occasion be accidental artists, or documentarians.
--nospam
some photographers did do their own darkroom work, but as i said, it wasn't required. many pro photographers worked with a pro lab who took care of the details.