Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 12/02/2013 23:21 (12/03/2013 11:21) |
Message-ID | <ps1q999hakv77e8uicmmkl35ubo3h74226@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
nospamAs long as it had the right tools. But we wrote nothing as complex as Visicalc. --
In article <g2ho99hp41u5ubdtgukl4pibl6kja6n768@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensnospamEric StevensnospamEric StevensEric Stevensnospam
Almost nothing useful was available in package form, not even for the IBM PC. We had to write much of our own stuff.
you could have written your own stuff on a mac too.
How do you know? You weren't there.
don't need to be.
if you could write it for the pc you could write it for the mac or whatever other hardware you wanted to use.
Pre-Mac - remember?
so write it for the apple ii.
how do you think visicalc came to be, if it was not possible to write a program for the apple ii?
Do you really think the ordinary user would write the equivalent of a spread sheet for themselves on an Apple II?
you said you wrote custom software for the ibm pc.
the point is that you could have written that software for any platform.