Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 12/06/2013 16:30 (12/06/2013 07:30) |
Message-ID | <2013120607305375803-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | PeterN |
Followups | PeterN (1h & 9m) > Savageduck Robert Coe (12h & 17m) > Savageduck |
PeterNIs a snapshot not a photograph? Is the snapshot shooter who produces nought but photographs sneeringly called snapshots, a photographer?
On 12/5/2013 11:51 PM, Savageduck wrote:SavageduckPeterN
On 2013-12-06 04:20:30 +0000, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>said:PeterNSavageduck
On 12/5/2013 10:53 PM, nospam wrote:nospamPeterN
In article <l7rg6v01mpo@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:nospamRobert CoePeterN
: >>Many photographers cannot write a script in PS, to automate simple : >>tasks. And they don't want to. : > : >they don't have to write anything. record an action and let the : >computer do that for you. : > : >or, use many of the premade actions available for free and $. : : Whoosh!
"Whoosh!"? I thought you and nospam were more or less on the same side of this argument.
When in response to my statement that many artists do not even want to know how to create as script, his response, in effect that it is easy, shows a lack of understanding of hwat I said.
i didn't say writing scripts was easy.
what i said was if they want to automate a particular task, they don't have to write a script at all.
they can record an action, doing what they normally would do to the image and let the computer take care of the details. or they can use actions already created by others. no script writing necessary.
as usual, whoosh applies to you.
would it shock you to know that most photographers do not record actions. the artist modifies each image, individually.
Not all photographers are "artists".
Depends on whether you classify a casual snapshooter as a photographer.