Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/03/2013 07:30 (12/03/2013 07:30) |
Message-ID | <slrnl9qume.vnb.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (2h & 41m) > Sandman |
I still don't know what you're getting at here. I think you don't know much about databases, yes. What does this have to do with your claim that you can't expalin what you programmed on the PC because it's too complicated?Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
Oh, PLEASE. "It's too complicated"... Sorriest excuse I ever saw from you.
What makes you think that you can say you don't believe me and tell me to step out of the argument one day and later demand what I would once have willingly told you?
Huh? What are you talking about? nospam is the one who asked you to explain yourself.
I'm responding to your final comment as quoted above under your name.
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:09:19 +1200 Message-ID: <sib9091tjfhq4pl41iu9fv8uiblg3uv1ik@4ax.com>I wrote
"I've used operating systems that worked with magnetic drum storage right through virtually the entire range of both floppy and hard discs. I bought and used a microcomputer system with one of the first such hard discs in captivity.
I've set up and written databases using Cromemco DBR (SQL), Informix (SQL), Basic, C, dBXL, Paradox and one or two others I can't remember.
I've used file systems including Cromix, Unix, CP/M, PC-DOS and all flavours of NTFS since version 3.5 (except 8)."
You responded to this saying:
"This I can't believe. *EVERYTHING* you've said leads to the logical conclusion that you know NOTHING about databases. So I am assuming that this is just a plain out lie."