Skip to main content
news

Re: converting raw images f...

Robert Coe
SubjectRe: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D
FromRobert Coe
Date12/05/2013 01:35 (12/04/2013 19:35)
Message-ID<ffiv999mtqheqelnr0m9hdpb23m255n5q0@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsAlan Browne

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:44:13 -0500, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>wrote:

Alan Browne
On 2013.11.30, 00:44 , nospam wrote:

nospam
In article <87bo12pqo0.fld@apaflo.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:

Floyd L. Davidson
Also be aware that with Linux if you become proficient at writing shell scripts there is just no end of ways to improve productivity. The ImageMagick tools are fabulous for editing. And there are many ways a shell script can speed up your workflow. For example, I preview my images, as JPEGs, with a very customized version of XV which can sort them into various directories. The JPEG images I don't want to convert with UFRAW go into one special directory, and then a shell script moves the RAW files to the same directories where the JPEG is now at. Then I run UFRAW and it never loads a file I don't want to process. Plus when I want to run the batch on all of them, I use a script that does odd things like automatically setting wavelet noise reduction depending on the ISO it was shot at, and it determines how many CPU cores are available and proceeds to keep each CPU busy with a different process (which with as many as 12 cores can make a huge difference in how fast a few hundred RAW files can be converted to TIFF files).

nospam
if that isn't proof that linux users do things in the most difficult and most convoluted way possible, i don't know what is.

Alan Browne
Well put. (Except that Linux users can make things even more difficult and convoluted when they really warm up).

To a Linux user the above inanity is a badge of honour.

In the Unix world it will always be 1978.

Bob