Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 11/30/2013 16:20 (11/30/2013 10:20) |
| Message-ID | <3ivj99lvbep2v62kpveagd4tv9rpvhoqrm@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Savageduck |
| Followups | Savageduck (57m) > Tony Cooper PeterN (2h & 25m) > Tony Cooper |
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:21:05 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:
SavageduckI constantly give thought to what will improve my own photography. While a better understanding of the combination of the mechanics - aperture, shutter, speed, ISO - are certainly a major goal, I still think that the real difference is mental.
On 2013-11-30 02:45:26 +0000, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) said:Floyd L. DavidsonSavageduck
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:SavageduckFloyd L. Davidson
[...] most importantly I have a feeling your hardline choice of OS is your real problem, and it is distracting you from paying attention to improving your photography.
That in fact seems to be *your* most serious impediment to improving your photography.
Not really, there is a whole shopping list of other things which impede the improvement of my photography.
Really good photographs result from *seeing* what is photographable. I know I've walked by what could have been a great photograph many, many times because I didn't see what could be there.
Yeah, I have to compose that scene, position myself to the best advantage, and set the camera to the best advantage, but if I don't see it, I don't do it.
Because I like to photograph people, I rank the ability to *anticipate* right up there with *seeing*. Just seeing people that are photographable isn't enough. I have to get better at anticipating where they will move, what they will do, and what dynamic may be in the offing.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
11/30/2013-
-
