Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/03/2013 21:55 (12/03/2013 21:55) |
| Message-ID | <slrnl9shbs.c0h.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | nospam (21m) |
In article <nses995v7g2n5j3d1742s2u2r7n88ckoq8@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
It's quite clear to anyone who knows how to read English that that is not his claim in any way, shape or form.nospamTony Cooper
no, the problem is that functionality is missing and what he wants to do is not possible. no amount of proficiency or time spent can fix that.
Are you claiming that no one can process an image successfully in Gimp? That the functionality incorporated in PS is required to process an image successfully?
That SavageDuck, with enough practice with the Gimp, couldn't produce a processed image that is fully acceptable to him?
Bullshit.Andreas Skitsnack in full effect.
nospam: What time is it? Tony: Elephants aren't pink!!! nospam: The topic wasn't about elephant, it was about time Tony: You don't get to decide what the topic was about!!!!!!nospam
that's not the issue.the issue is that some people claim the gimp can do anything that photoshop or lightroom can do.Tony Cooper
What kind of arrogance makes you think *your* issue is *the* issue? It's a constant for you to try to determine what the issue is, what "this is all about", or what "the discussion is...".
-- Sandman[.net]
11/30/2013-
-
