Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | nospam |
Date | 12/06/2013 18:42 (12/06/2013 12:42) |
Message-ID | <061220131242320211%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | PeterN |
no, you put back whatever you want, even when it has nothing to do with the topic.PeterNnospamSavageduckPeterNSavageducknospam
Somehow I think you guys have been using the wrong analogies for a photo NG. Forget about the racecar driver & architect, how about the owner of any digital camera, compact, or DSLR? Do they need to have a knowledge of how to operate a computer to shoot photographs with their digital camera?
no they do not, nor did film users need to know how to process their own film.
Is it your claim that in the film days, a good photo artist did not have to understand the how and why of film. He did not have to understand masking with film, the effect of various chemicals, and light sources on things such as contrast, and grain?
Did you read "GOOD" anywhere to qualify "film users"?
he adds and deletes words so he can have something to argue about.
He puts back the obvious context, to eliminate the irrelevancies, and ambiguities introduced by intellectually dishonest arguers.