Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 12/02/2013 22:47 (12/02/2013 16:47) |
| Message-ID | <021220131647358205%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | sid |
| Followups | sid (22h & 31m) > nospam |
In article <2095898.HQ1eQTvMrL@thecrap.blueyonder.co.uk>, sid <sidney@sidshouse.net>wrote:
sidthen you aren't paying attention, and if anyone is frothing, it would be you.
nospam wrote:sidnospamnospamsid
why people want to remain in the past, i do not know.
Because he likes to? Because he finds it works for him? Why are either of those things so offensive to you?
who said it's offensive? that's something you made up.
Well you've certainly been frothing at the mouth in a manner which suggested to me you that you are quite offended by the thought of anyone not running an adobe product on osx.
he made his choices without looking at any of the other options.nospamsid
as has been explained by myself and others, someone using linux has fewer choices, which puts them at a significant disadvantage.
As explained by myself and others, he has different choices, choices none the less, and he is not put at a significant dissadvantage for that. He does not want to use the same shit you are continually peddling here like some backstreet drug dealer, he has made his choices based on things other than wanting to have the most expensise accessories in a vain effort to make himself seem better.
where did price come into this anyway? computers aren't free.
then why don't very many people use linux if it's so simple, hassle-free and just as capable?sidnospamnospamsid
he has to come up with these crazy solutions because it's the only way.
That statement alone shows you know nothing about running a linux desktop, everything you say about it is nothing but hot air.
i know plenty about running a linux desktop. it's not worth the hassles.
Bullshit
maybe because it isn't.
nope.sidnospamsidnospamSavageducksid
Personally I prefer to be able to concentrate on working on my photography, however good or bad it might be. How much improvement it might need, and know that I can do reasonably advanced editing and adjustment post processing using LR5 + PS running on OSX. I certainly don't have a "geek flag" to fly.
So why are you so keen to berate others when they want to do the same thing but with different choices in os to you?
they can't do the same thing. that's the whole point.
Of course they can,
no they definitely can't.
Yes, they definitely can.
not that many, and all of them can run on os x natively, along with all of the commercial options that are far more capable.nospamsid
*many* very capable apps are not available to linux users.
And *many* very capable apps are available to linux users.
the gimp is about where photoshop was ten years ago and even lacks some features photoshop had 20 years ago.
not always, and usually with a lot more effort.nospamsid
that means they can't do the same things.
That means they can do they same things but with different software
actually quite a bit more work since key features are missing, such as non-destructive editing, adjustment layers, smart filters, smart objects, smart collections and direct uploading to hosting services.sidFloyd and I have both shown images here that have been produced using the software you are so scathing about, Unlike yourself who has never shown that you even use a camera let alone all the software products.nospam
you haven't said how much work it took.
No more work that it would take you with your choice of software.
because i've actually tried all of the options, unlike some people here.sidnospamnospamsid
it makes the post processing far more productive and less of a hassle.
It isn't a hassle,
of course it is.
How can you possibly know how much of a hassle it is? That's just more of your hot air.
11/30/2013-
-
