Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | PeterN |
| Date | 12/01/2013 19:34 (12/01/2013 13:34) |
| Message-ID | <l7fvdi02nl6@news6.newsguy.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
On 12/1/2013 3:28 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanFloyd has been very helpful in the past, and there is no reason why he would not continue. Yes, he is opinionated, but he usually knows what he is talking about. His photography is also fairly good. Which tools he uses ae his choice. They seem to work fine for him. No! I would not use them, only because I do not want to go through another learning curve.
In article <87zjoljmsh.fld@apaflo.com>, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:SandmanFloyd L. DavidsonSavageduckJ. Clarkenospam
If you don't want to be thought a clueless buffoon then either familiarize yourself with a current Windows system or STFU about things that are outside your experience.
right on.
+1
I appologize for discussion that was so far over your heads.
Making incorrect and idiotic statements isn't above anyone's head, Floyd. It's just stupidity. Get yourself some actual experience with computers and check to us in a couple of years. You wouldn't look quite so oblivious then.Floyd L. DavidsonSandman
I'll try to tone it down and only discuss theory, history or philosophy on a level that all three of you can get involved in. That is my usual policy here, and is the reason I don't post for days at a time...
Why not make that months at a time?
-- PeterN
11/30/2013-
-
