nospam
In article <nses995v7g2n5j3d1742s2u2r7n88ckoq8@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:

Tony Cooper
To really make your point, you'd have to put the same amount of time and effort into learning how to successfully process an image in Gimp that you've put into learning how to successfully process an image in Photoshop.

Most of the "kludge" effect is that you're working with a program that is not what you're used to using and proficient at using.

nospam
no, the problem is that functionality is missing and what he wants to do is not possible. no amount of proficiency or time spent can fix that.

Tony Cooper
Are you claiming that no one can process an image successfully in Gimp? That the functionality incorporated in PS is required to process an image successfully?

nospam
more reading problems?

how many times does it need to be said that the gimp does not have features that photoshop and lightroom have, making it *not* *possible* to do certain things?