Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | Alan Browne |
| Date | 11/30/2013 18:57 (11/30/2013 12:57) |
| Message-ID | <DaSdnQkljMG_ugfPnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | sid |
| Followups | sid (1h & 36m) Savageduck (2h & 29m) |
On 2013.11.30, 12:04 , sid wrote:
sidNo. You've misread entirely. The photographer should not at all be aware of the OS.
Tony Cooper wrote:Tony Coopersid
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 10:56:47 +0000, sid <sidney@sidshouse.net>wrote:sidTony Cooper
Savageduck wrote:Savageducksid
but most importantly I have a feeling your hardline choice of OS is your real problem, and it is distracting you from paying attention to improving your photography.
That is just ridiculous, what on earth does his OS have to do with improving his photography? At no point ever has the operating system on my pc affected my ability to chosse what to shoot or how to compose that shot or how to expose it. Is that what I'm doing wrong d'you think?
You misread the post.
Um, I don't know why you'd say that. Savadgeduck said using linux would affect his (the op) ability to improve his photography. I said it wouldn't.Tony Coopersid
The Duck is saying just the opposite.
I think he's saying the above
To process photography on a Linux machine requires more awareness and expertise of the OS v. OS X or even the Redmond abomination.
Linux is at best third choice of photography professionals and dedicated amateurs and that is reflected by the lack of commercial support for it in Linux land.
-- "The radio was once expected to promote international understanding and co-operation; it has turned out to be a means of insulating one nation from another." -George Orwell, 1945
11/30/2013-
-
