Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 12/01/2013 22:16 (12/01/2013 16:16) |
| Message-ID | <929n995fplf31f9vvqffo6aqig2r24pr2j@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | Sandman (12h & 39m) > Tony Cooper |
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:06:01 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamSo what? Have you seen his images? Why does he need to follow the herd in order to have machine-capabilities to process them any differently?
In article <4621813.8efJSClhjD@thecrap.blueyonder.co.uk>, sid <sidney@sidshouse.net>wrote:nospamSavageducksid
I refer you to Floyd's response providing what can best be describes as "arcane":
<snip Floyds example>Savageducksid
Tell me that isn't arcane.
Some people like to use their computer in that manner and if he enjoys doing so good luck to him. He'd be just the same if he used osx.
only because he refuses to learn anything new.
What it comes down to, in the area of photography, is whether or not the person produces good photographs. Floyd does.
He's an opinionated, egotistical asshole here, but so are you. The difference is that we know Floyd's photographic output is good and we don't know if yours is or not.
Put your money where your mouth is. If you have good photographs, and one of the reasons they are good is because you have some better processing system than Floyd's, show 'em. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
11/30/2013-
-
