Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | nospam |
Date | 11/30/2013 20:49 (11/30/2013 14:49) |
Message-ID | <301120131449174427%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Tony Cooperit wasn't roundabout and i didn't say take more photos.
It's also been suggested, in a roundabout way, that reducing post-processing time allows the user to spend more time photographing things. There's some validity to that concept, but taking more photographs doesn't mean taking better photographs unless you consider that more photographs means better chances of taking a good photography by accident.
For the high-volume photographer, organization for selection is the most time-consuming aspect. If that photographer took 1,000 shots of an event, reviewing those 1,000 shots and determining which are worthy of efforts in post is the part that takes up time. The actual post work on the individual shots is minimal if the photographer has decent skills using the camera.the photographer needs skills using the software to process them too, otherwise they're making more work for themselves.
If one OS means the organization can be done faster or simpler, then you'd have a point for a limited number of photographers. But, is it the OS that would allow this?to an extent the choice of operating system does matter, since asset management apps are mostly mac/win.
So, how can a different OS make a person a better photographer?it doesn't. it has absolutely no effect on their photography skills.