Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 12/04/2013 01:25 (12/03/2013 19:25) |
| Message-ID | <031220131925501826%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
In article <2bms999opmua4hejg5ltdsfur89nkpcs14@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
that has nothing to do with the topic, and 'successful' is vague anyway.Tony CoopernospamTony CooperTony Coopernospam
To really make your point, you'd have to put the same amount of time and effort into learning how to successfully process an image in Gimp that you've put into learning how to successfully process an image in Photoshop.
Most of the "kludge" effect is that you're working with a program that is not what you're used to using and proficient at using.
no, the problem is that functionality is missing and what he wants to do is not possible. no amount of proficiency or time spent can fix that.
Are you claiming that no one can process an image successfully in Gimp? That the functionality incorporated in PS is required to process an image successfully?
more reading problems?
how many times does it need to be said that the gimp does not have features that photoshop and lightroom have, making it *not* *possible* to do certain things?
My question asks if an image can be processed in Gimp with a successful result.
Yes or no?
the claim was that the gimp and other linux apps can do what photoshop and lightroom can do, it cannot. even the authors of the gimp say it can't.
11/30/2013-
-
