Skip to main content
news

Re: converting raw images f...

nospam
Google Google
SubjectRe: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D
Fromnospam
Date12/18/2013 03:15 (12/17/2013 21:15)
Message-ID<171220132115541088%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsRobert Coe
In article <gt02b9d49cu6vn72gtdq3fr2tb88gdld4p@4ax.com>, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM>wrote:

Robert Coe
: >: >What doesn't make sense to me is my participation in this ridiculous, : >: >rambling, time-wasting thread. : >: : >: Then why did you bother to resuscitate it by responding to your own 9 : >: day old post? : > : >I didn't "resuscitate" it. It had been posted to as recently as the day : >before. : : the headers say otherwise.

The headers say no such thing.

really? then explain this:

: >On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:20:49 -0800, Savageduck : ><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote: : >: On 2013-12-17 04:04:52 +0000, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM>said: : >: : >: >On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 11:04:24 -0500, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM>wrote: : >: >: On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 04:24:14 -0800, Savageduck : >: ><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> : >: >: wrote:

There is at least one article in the thread that was posted the day before I posted my article.

one might have been but the thread dwindled down a week ago, including your own post from 12/7/13.

If you can't see it, perhaps you should have a talk with your Usenet service provider.

there's no problem at my end, on two different news providers.

perhaps *your* news provider is the problem.