Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/04/2013 11:50 (12/04/2013 11:50) |
Message-ID | <slrnl9u2at.e9q.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (11h & 30m) > Sandman |
It's not an opinion.Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
A race car driver doesn't need to know the first thing about car mechanics (but it's a fair bet that many do) in order to race the car.
All the succesful ones have engineering skills which help them get the best out of their cars.
Of course not.
You are welcome to that opinion.
But then you have to explain how it is that individual drivers will have their cars set up differently to suit their own preferences.No I don't. For these reasons:
That's not an answer to my question. Me not saying that is not the same as me saying that the "Programmer leads the way". You have a reading disorder. Maybe dyslexia? Maybe ADHD? I don't know, but you clearly can't read English.Eric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
This is a lot more true - the programmer would do well to understand the basics of arhitecture (instead of the otehr way around) to better build solutions for hus collegues. And, interestingly, this is usually how it's done.
Goodness gracious. Do yo see the programmer in command?
Huh? Your question doesn't seem to be related to the sentence it followed.
You seem to have the programmer leading the way.
What part of the sentence made it "seem" that way, Eric. The part where the programmer would do well to understand the basics of architecture to better build solutions for his collegues? How do you arrivbe at the conclusion that I meant that the "programmer leads the way"??
Because you didn't say the architect could do well to understand the basics of computing.
I have no idea why you keep arguing about things you don't understand.Eric StevensI was astonished at nospam's narrow view of architects writing apps.Sandman
...something you've yet to offer any conclusive counter argument for. And indeed - you are now agreeing with me that architects doesn't write apps.
Why bother arguing?
Nope. "Someone" does not "have to" understand it at all.Eric StevensAre you instead suggesting that the programmer has to understand architecture?Sandman
Nope. If I were, I would have said that. And since I didn't, I can't see why you're asking this question.
Well, someone has to understand something about the aother parties role.
My opinion is that the architect is the creative person and has the responsibility to know how to employ the tools he is using.You should really stop uttering your opinions in the form of statements of facts. If you learned to read and write English correctly, then most of this could be avoided.
I.e. you have no support, and you know it. You know what that makes the statement by now.Well, maybe Catia could, but I can't think of anything else (that's not to say there isn't anything). But even making Catia do the job would require a very considerable number of scripts.Sandman
You're dodging the question. You should now have provided support for your claims that:1. A "zillion" scripts were used by the architects in the making of the designs in that linkEric Stevens
By golly yes.
Also something you've yet to support, making this the same as the above.SandmanEric Stevens
2. That those scripts were made by the architects themselves.
They would certainly have spelled out what they wanted to do and what tools they wanted to use.
Why? You haven't told us anything. It's your claim, and you refuse to back it up, why would you expect me to talk about your example? I've already relayed many of the things I know about design work in conjunction with programmers in earlier posts.Eric StevensSandmanEric StevensThe question is, who wrote them and with what end in mind?Sandman
If you don't know, why would you use the link as an example for your position?
I have a fairly good idea. The question is, do you?
Absolutely.
Then tell us.