Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 12/08/2013 03:51 (12/08/2013 15:51) |
Message-ID | <2an7a9trf396kmhi49cip2g8p8aose1tbt@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1d, 3h & 43m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanThat the zillions of scripts were produced by architects is an implication you have been trying to put in my mouth for some time. I'm sorry, I never said that. That's why you won't get me to support it. --
In article <2n45a9p469o5ov5e93nd5pkhqn09gkfu6q@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric StevensSavageduck
even http://tinyurl.com/k33pc4h
Today he might consider something along those awful lines, but he was able to do this with pencil, pen, ink, and a drawing table in 1937, 76 years ago, and with Wright, the current flock of architects have some mighty footprints to follow in, even though he didn't exactly embrace the vertical. < http://www.newyorkpanorama.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2010-01-guggenheim-2000.jpg
Oh stop it duck, you know perfectly well that such a thing requires a "zillion" architect-programmed scripts. It can't be done otherwise :)
If you go back to my original comment you will find you are now way off the beam.
Yeah, I'm making fun of your hyperbolic comment about the buildings in your link required "zillions" of scripts written by architects, something you've yet to provide *any* support for.